In last week’s Telegraph supplement on outsourcing the word innovation was used twenty one times in the first two articles. The (over)use of the term seems to elude to or promise a solution without really getting to grips with what the word really means or the effort required to implement. The lure is big with statements such as ‘However, although innovation can yield high profit margins and secure market leader status, suppliers need to recognise that it does not come without risk, especially in an existing contractual environment’
This is typical of the current level of communication (mostly from the Government) that suggests that innovation is really the only way out of the desperate situation that most businesses find themselves in. So what do these businesses actually know about innovation now or more likely, what do they remember about it? At some point in their early lives organisations were innovative, they had an idea that they developed and took it to market. It became successful and the business thrived and grew. They added to the idea and it was updated over time. This success required that they put in systems to ensure that they continued to be successful at what they did. These systems and processes were designed for productivity and efficiency and to deliver reliable profits and to reduce any potential risks.
Innovation has a high degree of risk and requires a different mindset and skill set in staff to deliver it and this is not typically the same mindset and skill set required to manage efficiency and productivity. These two drivers of a business will always be in conflict with one another yet we are now suggesting that innovation will now become the panacea for all problems. But if distressed businesses were innovating all along they would not be in the state they are currently in.
Organisations are simply not designed for innovation. So where does that leave them? Probably with a very steep learning curve, possibly with some problems around budgeting, definitely bringing some consultants in and with more than a few headaches and difficult decisions. I was very lucky many years ago to be in a meeting with the late Peter Drucker. My one big ‘take’ from the meeting was something that Peter had obviously repeated many times but still seemed to make him smile and that was “after all is said and done, more is said than done” and I suspect the same will be true with innovation.